On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 18:29 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | The question was specifically in regards to timelines; completion so > | that ongoing paludis vs pkgcore vs portage crap can be put to rest. > > *shrug* I don't see PMS as being viable until there's a fully > conformant independent implementation, personally. So that more or > less means that for me, PMS will become a priority at around the same > time that Paludis 1.0_pre is released.
Are you really saying that you won't be releasing this information until such time as *Paludis* meets it, even though portage/pkgcore may not? Isn't the *point* of this spec to try to bring everyone on the same page? -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
