Fernando J. Pereda napsal(a): > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: >> Oh well, this apparently doesn't go anywhere, slacking is just >> wonderful, maintainers should just STFU and obey the almighty slacking >> arches, security is the least of a concern and no priority, not >> answering a on bug for half a year makes lots of sense and all is fine >> and dandy. More cruft in the tree for t3h win. > > Yeah, we are so slackers that we are able to maintain a whole tree of > keywords with less than 10 persons and less than 10 machines (alpha > example). > > You probably want a shell account on a mips/alpha/... machine so you can > start helping, right?
This whole frickin' debate started when vivo mentioned a bug where noone from the concerned arches gave a damn for half a year. Not even uttering a simple "we don't care, punt it" or "we have still an issue with this and are working on it". Then ciaranm came w/ his priorities junk, spb joined to fuel the flame (as always) and then you came horribly offended (for whatever weird reason) about how I'm daring to dictate some arches how they should do their job. OMG how hard is it to post one sentence on such bugs instead of playing a dead horse? Really, stop this nonsense. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
