On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 06:50:58PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: > Ah. That's apparently much more important than not breaking users by > providing them w/ non-vulnerable, decently uptodate stuff that's not > ridden by tons of bugs. Yup. :P
Why do you keep trying to tell arch maintainers how to do their job ? Do I tell you how to do yours ? Users of security-supported archs are not affected so what's your point again ? Assuming you have a valid one, of course, so please don't come back with that "maintainters don't want to maintain old/broken stuff" kind of argument. I'm both an arch-maintainer and ebuild-maintainer and don't see a problem here... so from your _vast_ experience as both an ebuild-maintainer and arch-maintainer, what's the problem? - ferdy -- Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git) 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpnAnd6PQL1B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
