On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:50:58 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Stephen Bennett napsal(a): | > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:18:26 +0100 | > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | >> Sure I did... Could you tell me why should we accumulate broken and | >> vulnerable junk in the tree for years? (Outdated ebuild A depends | >> on junky outdated ebuild B which depends on crappy, unsupported | >> ebuilds C, D and E which... ) | > | > To avoid breaking the dep tree for users. Quite simple really. | | Ah. That's apparently much more important than not breaking users by | providing them w/ non-vulnerable, decently uptodate stuff that's not | ridden by tons of bugs. Yup. :P
So if it's "ridden by tons of bugs", why did it ever get marked stable? -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
