On Mon, 2025-09-15 at 08:40 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 2025-09-15 04:12:01, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > You're missing the point above. The implementations aren't guaranteed > > to be ABI-compatible, and USE flags can't handle that, unless every > > single package has a [openblas=] and so on. > > > > I know, but I don't think that's too crazy, or even the hardest part > of this. With a USE_EXPAND and an eclass, the flag and dependency > could be handled automatically.
Can you suggest a good (and easy to use) benchmark for BLAS/LAPACK? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
