On Sun, Sep 14, 2025, 22:13 Michał Górny <[email protected]> wrote:
> unless every single package has a [openblas=] and so on.
Suppose we take a step back to consider a general case. A software package
needs some library routines which can be fulfilled by any of a few
different non-ABI-compatible dependencies. Would this ("[openblas=]") be
the normal way to handle the situation?
Why are linear algebra libraries a special case?
I don't know enough about FlexiBLAS to support or oppose the change, but
I'm very interested in the outcome of this discussion.
-Mitchell Dorrell
>
