On Sun, 2025-09-14 at 17:45 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Instead of putting FlexiBLAS in $libdir, I guess we could make the > $libdir implementation configurable via USE and have FlexiBLAS be one > of the options. Default to OpenBLAS on most arches, unless you need > the reference implementation as a dependency? But then we would have > to make sure that every implementation knows how to install itself to > two places, etc. It would be even more work than doing it 1x for > FlexiBLAS, and I'm not volunteering, so this is just thinking out > loud.
You're missing the point above. The implementations aren't guaranteed to be ABI-compatible, and USE flags can't handle that, unless every single package has a [openblas=] and so on. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
