Hi, On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:09 -0400, Greg Hasseler wrote: > On Monday 25 April 2005 03:55 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in more > > than a year, and it is superseded in every way by sys-power/cpufreqd > > (which, in turn, is actively maintained by upstream). > > > > There are currently 5 open bugs about sys-power/speedfreq in Gentoo > > bugzilla - most of them indicating that it needs rather large changes to > > be useful. > > > > If no one objects (and claims the package + fixes the open bugs) I will > > add sys-power/speedfreq to package.mask in a week from now. > > > > Sincerely, > > Brix > > Once sys-power/speedfreq is masked (well, if it gets masked), the power > management guide at > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/power-management-guide.xml#doc_chap3 should > probably be updated to remove sys-power/speedfreq from the text, or at a > minimum from the recommended daemon.
Good catch - I've added Dennis to CC: on this mail :) Sincerely, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
