On Tuesday 26 April 2005 06:57, Alin Nastac wrote: > Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > >On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 23:34 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote: > >>If it is superseded by cpufreqd, why not removing it from the tree and > >>append "move sys-power/speedfreq sys-power/cpufreqd" line in > >>updates/2Q-2005? > > > >Because 'move' is for renaming packages? > > we used move to overwrite zebra with quagga. see bug 75766.
In that case, quagga was a fork of zebra that used the same versioning. cpufreqd has nothing to do with speedfeq. Regards, Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list