On Monday 25 April 2005 07:30 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:09 -0400, Greg Hasseler wrote: > > On Monday 25 April 2005 03:55 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in > > > more than a year, and it is superseded in every way by > > > sys-power/cpufreqd (which, in turn, is actively maintained by > > > upstream). > > > > > > There are currently 5 open bugs about sys-power/speedfreq in Gentoo > > > bugzilla - most of them indicating that it needs rather large changes > > > to be useful. > > > > > > If no one objects (and claims the package + fixes the open bugs) I will > > > add sys-power/speedfreq to package.mask in a week from now. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > Brix > > > > Once sys-power/speedfreq is masked (well, if it gets masked), the power > > management guide at > > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/power-management-guide.xml#doc_chap3 should > > probably be updated to remove sys-power/speedfreq from the text, or at a > > minimum from the recommended daemon. > > Good catch - I've added Dennis to CC: on this mail :) > > Sincerely, > Brix
Well, I was following the guide the other day so it was fresh in my mind :-D Gosh I love the smell of new laptop! ----------------------- Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
