Hi,
> Yes, and commitment is the key. The IPMC can fix this if we take some > examples. > > (1) We have elected non-members to the IPMC. I was one. We should be more > active in identifying merit. This is part of the issue, but I think with a large IPMC and a very large pool of potential people it's a lot harder to recognise people with merit compared to other PMCs. Anyone that is brought up for discussion, unless they are well known to several active IPMC members, doesn't tend to go anywhere. (e.g. see last person I brought up for possible inclusion in the IPMC). Its also hard to recognise people who have merit from working in their podling (or even several podlings) as an IPMC member needs to be active in all of podlings to se that activity. And finally when we do recognise people, there's probably a greater chance (compared to other PMCs) that they may not be interested in joining the IPMC as it may be tangential to their interests. > (4) As merit is acquired we VOTE on private@incubator. This proposal including voting for new IPMC members in the usual way. Thanks, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
