Thanks John!

On 08/02/2017 03:23 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> You can also count me in as a mentor.
> 
> John
> 
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:14 PM Steve Lawrence <stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Understood. Thanks for the interest!
>>
>> - Steve
>>
>> On 08/02/2017 02:57 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> It was not so much the lack of committers as it was the current
>> diversity. That is not a blocker for entry to Incubation.
>>>
>>> I am willing to be one of the Mentors. Once there are at least two more
>> we can push forward.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>> On Aug 1, 2017, at 5:09 AM, Steve Lawrence <
>> stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Discussions have died down, and I think the consensus from the responses
>>>> is that the issues are 1) the lack of committers and 2) the lack of a
>>>> champion and mentors. We hope to address #1 and grow the community as
>>>> part of incubation. Is anyone interested in being a champion or mentor
>>>> and help us with #2?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> - Steve
>>>>
>>>> On 07/26/2017 04:06 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
>>>>> This sounds like a very interesting project.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don’t have the time to mentor at the moment but I will keep a close
>> eye on it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Chris Mattmann
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/25/17, 11:53 AM, "McHenry, Kenton Guadron" <mche...@illinois.edu>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>    Hi Dave,
>>>>>
>>>>>    The developers that were at NCSA have moved on to other
>> organizations.  While we still leverage Daffodil and are very much
>> interested in seeing it move forward, development is currently done by the
>> Tresys team.  Agreed on the synergy with Tika.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Kenton McHenry, Ph.D.
>>>>>    Principal Research Scientist, Adjunct Assistant Professor of
>> Computer Science
>>>>>    Deputy Director of the Scientific Software & Applications Division
>>>>>    National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of
>> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>>>>>
>>>>>    On Jul 24, 2017, at 1:55 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net
>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>    Hi Kenton,
>>>>>
>>>>>    Is there any reason that you and others from the NCSA are not
>> Initial Committers? That would make this proposal stronger.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Regarding Apache Tika - it relies on other projects including
>> Apache POI and Apache PDFBox. They are pragmatic about what is used. If
>> Daffodil works to expand then I think that there would be good synergy
>> between the projects. I know as a POI PMC member that the POI community has
>> significantly benefited from the Tika community some of whom are from Mitre.
>>>>>
>>>>>    To date Tika has not emphasized structured data, although they do
>> extract content from Excel and OpenOffice.
>>>>>
>>>>>    I am intrigued.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Regards,
>>>>>    Dave
>>>>>
>>>>>    On Jul 24, 2017, at 10:55 AM, McHenry, Kenton Guadron <
>> mche...@illinois.edu<mailto:mche...@illinois.edu>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>    Yes, DFDL and its open source implementation Daffodil are more
>> about file formats and getting access to the entirety of a file's contents
>> in a consistent way through machine readable specifications.  The work has
>> implications in the area of digital preservation allowing one to preserve
>> these machine readable specifications rather than all the tools needed to
>> open/save a file in order to work with it.  Imagine someone developing
>> graphics software to work with 3D models and not having to worry about the
>> hundreds of formats out there for 3D meshes (whether there are tools for
>> opening the files and whether they can get access to those tools, whether
>> the spec is available and worrying about how complex that spec is to
>> implement, etc.), and simply building their code around the contents (e.g.
>> vertices, faces, etc.).  One could come up with similar scenarios for other
>> data types (documents, images, videos, audio, depth data, numeric data).
>> Ideally tools built supporting DFDL, could someday, support any format for
>> that type without the developer having to worry about the details of how
>> that data is represented within a file.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Kenton McHenry, Ph.D.
>>>>>    Principal Research Scientist, Adjunct Assistant Professor of
>> Computer Science
>>>>>    Deputy Director of the Scientific Software & Applications Division
>>>>>    National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of
>> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>>>>>
>>>>>    On Jul 24, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Steve Lawrence <
>> stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com<mailto:stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>    I'll preface this saying that I don't have a ton of experience with
>>>>>    Apache Tika. But based on my understanding, Tika and Daffodil do
>> have
>>>>>    somewhat similar goals, but reach them in different ways. For
>> example,
>>>>>    Tika requires that one writes /code/ to perform data extraction,
>> usually
>>>>>    relying on existing Java libraries to extract the desired metadata.
>> The
>>>>>    downside to this is that code can be buggy, and libraries might not
>> even
>>>>>    exist for formats of interest (especially common with legacy and
>>>>>    military data).
>>>>>
>>>>>    Daffodil, on the other hand, does not require one to write any code.
>>>>>    Instead, one writes a DFDL Schema (similar to XML Schema, with DFDL
>>>>>    annotations) that fully describes the data, which Daffodil then
>> uses to
>>>>>    convert the data to XML/JSON for extraction. So adding support for
>> a new
>>>>>    format means writing a new schema rather than new code. And less
>> code
>>>>>    generally means less bugs. Also, for secure systems that require
>>>>>    certification, generally speaking, it is easier to certify a schema
>> as
>>>>>    compared to code.
>>>>>
>>>>>    We certainly don't believe that Daffodil could replace Tika, but it
>> does
>>>>>    have the potential to add new functionality to Tika for formats
>> that do
>>>>>    not have existing libraries. One of our goals is to look into
>>>>>    integrating Daffodil support into tools like Tika. We'd love to hear
>>>>>    from Tika devs if this is something they'd be interested in.
>>>>>
>>>>>    I'll also add that whereas Tika tends to focus primarily on
>> metadata,
>>>>>    DFDL schemas usually describe an entire file format down to the
>> byte, so
>>>>>    one can extract more than just meta data, including text and binary
>>>>>    data. Further differentiating, Daffodil has support for serializing
>> data
>>>>>    (called unparse) from the XML/JSON representation, allowing one to
>>>>>    transform or filter data as well. We don't believe this feature is
>> all
>>>>>    that applicable to Tika, but may be useful to other technologies
>> such as
>>>>>    filtering or data fuzzing technologies.
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Steve
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    On 07/24/2017 10:59 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>    What is the relationship between Daffodil and something like Apache
>> Tika's
>>>>>    extraction engine?
>>>>>
>>>>>    On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Steve Lawrence <
>>>>>    stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com<mailto:stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>    Dear Apache Incubator Community,
>>>>>
>>>>>    We would like to start a discussion around a proposal to bring
>> Daffodil
>>>>>    into the Apache Incubator. Daffodil is a implementation of the DFDL
>>>>>    specification used to convert between fixed format data and
>> XML/JSON.
>>>>>
>>>>>    The draft proposal can be found in the wiki at the following URL:
>>>>>
>>>>>    https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DaffodilProposal
>>>>>
>>>>>    We do not yet have a champion or mentors, but it was recommended
>> that we
>>>>>    create a proposal and send it to this list to potentially find those
>>>>>    that might be interested. The text for the draft proposal is found
>>>>>    below. We look forward to your input.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Thanks,
>>>>>    -Steve
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    = Daffodil Proposal =
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Abstract ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    Daffodil is an implementation of the Data Format Description
>> Language
>>>>>    (DFDL) used to convert between fixed format data and XML/JSON.
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Proposal ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    The Data Format Description Language (DFDL) is a specification,
>>>>>    developed by the Open Grid Forum, capable of describing many data
>>>>>    formats, including both textual and binary, scientific and numeric,
>>>>>    legacy and modern, commercial record-oriented, and many industry and
>>>>>    military standards. It defines a language that is a subset of W3C
>> XML
>>>>>    schema to describe the logical format of the data, and annotations
>>>>>    within the schema to describe the physical representation.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification
>> that
>>>>>    uses these DFDL schemas to parse fixed format data into an infoset,
>>>>>    which is most commonly represented as either XML or JSON. This
>> allows
>>>>>    the use of well-established XML or JSON technologies and libraries
>> to
>>>>>    consume, inspect, and manipulate fixed format data in existing
>>>>>    solutions. Daffodil is also capable of the reverse by serializing or
>>>>>    "unparsing" an XML or JSON infoset back to the original data format.
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Background ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    Many different software solutions need to consume and manage data,
>>>>>    including data directed routing, databases, data analysis, data
>>>>>    cleansing, data visualizing, and more. A key aspect of such
>> solutions is
>>>>>    the need to transform the data into an easily consumable format.
>>>>>    Usually, this means that for each unique data format, one develops a
>>>>>    tool that can read and extract the necessary information, often
>> leading
>>>>>    to ad-hoc and data-format-specific description systems. Such
>> systems are
>>>>>    often proprietary, not well tested, and incompatible, leading to
>> vendor
>>>>>    lock-in, flawed software, and increased training costs. DFDL is a
>> new
>>>>>    standard, with version 1.0 completed in October of 2016, that solves
>>>>>    these problems by defining an open standard to describe many
>> different
>>>>>    data formats and how to parse and unparse between the data and
>> XML/JSON.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Two closed source implementations of DFDL currently exist. The
>> first was
>>>>>    created by IBM and is now part of their IBM® Integration Bus
>> product.
>>>>>    The second was created by the European Space Agency, called DFDL4S
>> or
>>>>>    "DFDL for Space" targeted at the challenges of their satellite data
>>>>>    processing.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Around 2005, Pacific Northwest National Lab created Defuddle, built
>> as
>>>>>    an open source implementation and proof of concept of the draft DFDL
>>>>>    specification and a test bed to feed new concepts into specification
>>>>>    development. Primary development of Defuddle was eventually taken
>> over
>>>>>    by the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA).
>> However,
>>>>>    due to evolution of the DFDL specification and architectural and
>>>>>    performance issues with Defuddle, around 2009, NCSA restarted the
>>>>>    project with the new name of Daffodil, with a goal of implementing
>> the
>>>>>    complete DFDL specification. Daffodil development continued at NCSA
>>>>>    until around 2012, at which point development slowed due to budget
>>>>>    limitations. Shortly thereafter, primary development was picked up
>> by
>>>>>    Tresys Technology where it continues today, with contributions from
>>>>>    other entities such as the Navy Research Lab, the Air Force Research
>>>>>    Lab, MITRE, and Booz Allen Hamilton. In February of 2015, Daffodil
>>>>>    version 1.0.0 was released, including support for the DFDL features
>>>>>    needed to parse many common file formats. Daffodil version 2.0.0 is
>>>>>    expected to be released in August of 2017, which will include
>> unparse
>>>>>    support with one-to-one parsing feature parity.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Entities including IBM, MITRE, NATO NCI Agency, Northrop-Grumman,
>> Quark
>>>>>    Security, Raytheon, and Tresys Technology have developed DFDL
>> schemas
>>>>>    for many data formats from varying technology domains, including
>> PNG,
>>>>>    GIF, BMP, PCAP, HL7, EDIFACT, NACHA, vCard, iCalendar, and
>> MIL-STD-2045,
>>>>>    many of which are publicly available on the DFDL Schemas github.
>> There
>>>>>    are also a number of military-application data formats, the
>>>>>    specifications of which are not public, which have historically been
>>>>>    very difficult and expensive to process, and for which DFDL schemas
>> have
>>>>>    been created or are actively in development; these include
>>>>>    MIL-STD-6040/USMTF ATO, MIL-STD-6017/VMF, MIL-STD-6016/NATO STANAG
>> 5516
>>>>>    (aka "Link16").
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Rationale ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    Numerous software solutions exist that consume, inspect, analyze,
>> and
>>>>>    transform data, many of which can be found in the Apache Software
>>>>>    Foundation (ASF). In order for tools like these to consume new
>> types of
>>>>>    data, custom extensions are usually required, often with high
>>>>>    development and testing costs. Daffodil fills a clear gap in many of
>>>>>    these solutions, providing a simple and low cost way to transform
>> data
>>>>>    to XML or JSON, which many of these tools natively support already.
>> With
>>>>>    the upcoming 2.0.0 release, the Daffodil project will have achieved
>> a
>>>>>    level of functionality in both parse and unparse that, when
>> integrated
>>>>>    into existing solutions, could provide for a new method to quickly
>>>>>    enable support for new data formats.
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Initial Goals ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    * Relicense the existing code from the University of Illinois/NCSA
>> Open
>>>>>    Source License to the Apache License version 2.0, working with
>> Apache
>>>>>    Legal to ensure correctness, and with Daffodil contributors to get
>>>>>    their permission.
>>>>>    * Move the existing codebase, documentation, bugs, and mailing
>> lists to
>>>>>    the Apache hosted infrastructure
>>>>>    * Establish a formal release process and schedule, allowing for
>>>>>    dependable release cycles in a manner consistent with the Apache
>>>>>    development process.
>>>>>    * Build relationships with ASF projects to add Daffodil support
>> where
>>>>>    appropriate
>>>>>    * Grow the community to establish a diversity of background and
>> expertise.
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Current Status ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Meritocracy ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    All initial committers are familiar with the principles of
>> meritocracy.
>>>>>    The Daffodil project has followed the model of meritocracy in the
>> past,
>>>>>    providing multiple outside entities commit access based on the
>> quality
>>>>>    of their contributions. In order to grow the Daffodil user base and
>>>>>    development community, we are dedicated to continuing to operate
>>>>>    Daffodil as a meritocracy.
>>>>>
>>>>>    A key ingredient in a meritocracy of developers is open group code
>>>>>    review. The Daffodil project has operated in this mode throughout
>> its
>>>>>    existence and this provides a forum to improve the code, verify code
>>>>>    quality, and educate new developers on the code base.
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Community ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    Daffodil has a small community of users and developers. Although
>> primary
>>>>>    Daffodil development is done by Tresys Technology, a handful of
>> other
>>>>>    contributions have come from other entities including the Navy
>> Research
>>>>>    Lab, the Air Force Research Lab, MITRE, and Booz Allen Hamilton. In
>>>>>    addition to developers, multiple users of Daffodil have created DFDL
>>>>>    schemas, including entities such as MITRE, IBM, Raytheon, Quark
>>>>>    Security, and Tresys Technology. The DFDL Schemas github community
>> has
>>>>>    been created as a place for DFDL schemas to be published. The
>> Daffodil
>>>>>    project also makes use of mailing lists, !HipChat, and Confluence
>>>>>    Questions to build a community of users and system for support.
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Core Developers ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    The core developers of Daffodil are employed by Tresys Technology.
>> We
>>>>>    will work to grow the community among a more diverse set of
>> developers
>>>>>    and industries.
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Alignment ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    Daffodil was created as an open source project with a philosophy
>>>>>    consistent with The Apache Way. A strong belief in meritocracy,
>>>>>    community involvement in decisions, openness, and ensuring a high
>> level
>>>>>    of quality in code, documentation, and testing are some of our
>> shared
>>>>>    core beliefs.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Further, as mentioned in the Rationale section, Daffodil fills a gap
>>>>>    that exists in many ASF projects, including !NiFi, Spark, Storm,
>> Hadoop,
>>>>>    Tika, and others. In order for tools like these to consume new
>> types of
>>>>>    data, custom extensions are usually required. Rather than create
>> such
>>>>>    extensions, Daffodil provides an easy and standards-compliant way to
>>>>>    transform data to XML or JSON, which many of these tools already
>>>>>    natively support.
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Known Risks ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Orphaned Products ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    The current core developers are the leading contributors in the
>> space of
>>>>>    DFDL and wish to see it flourish. Though there is some risk that the
>>>>>    initial committers all come from the same company, a goal of
>> entering
>>>>>    into incubation is to grow the development community to minimize the
>>>>>    risk of reliance on a single company.
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Inexperience with Open Source ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    The Daffodil project began as an open source project and has
>> continued
>>>>>    that model throughout development. This includes public bug
>> tracking,
>>>>>    git revision control, automated builds and tests, and a public wiki
>> for
>>>>>    documentation.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Additionally, the current core developers and initial committers all
>>>>>    work for a company that relies on, believes in, promotes, and has
>> led or
>>>>>    contributed to many open source software projects, including SELinux
>>>>>    Userspace, OpenSCAP, CLIP, refpolicy, setools, RPM, and others. As
>> such,
>>>>>    there is low risk related to inexperience with open source software
>> and
>>>>>    processes.
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Homogeneous Developers ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    The proposed initial committers come from a single entity, though
>> we are
>>>>>    committed to growing the Daffodil development community to include a
>>>>>    broad group of additional committers from a wide array of
>> industries.
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Reliance on Salaried Developers ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    The proposed initial committers are paid by their employer to
>> contribute
>>>>>    to the Daffodil project. We expect that Daffodil development will
>>>>>    continue with salaried developers, and are committed to growing the
>>>>>    community to include non-salaried developers as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Relationship with other Apache Projects ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    As mentioned in the Alignment section, Daffodil fills a clear gap in
>>>>>    numerous other ASF projects that consume and manage large amounts
>> of data.
>>>>>
>>>>>    As a specific example, Daffodil developers have created a Daffodil
>>>>>    Apache !NiFi Processor, currently in use in data transfer solutions,
>>>>>    which allows one to ingest non-native data into an Apache !NiFi
>> pipeline
>>>>>    as XML or JSON. This processor was well received by the Apache !NiFi
>>>>>    developers, with positive comments about the concise API and how it
>>>>>    could handle non-native data. Daffodil developers have also
>> successfully
>>>>>    prototyped integration with Apache Spark. We believe Daffodil could
>>>>>    provide a strong benefit to many other ASF projects that handle
>> fixed
>>>>>    format data. We anticipate working closely with such ASF projects to
>>>>>    include Daffodil where applicable to increase their ability to
>> support
>>>>>    new data formats with minimal effort.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Daffodil also depends on existing ASF projects, including Apache
>> Commons
>>>>>    and Apache Xerces.
>>>>>
>>>>>    === An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    Although the Apache brand may certainly help to attract more
>>>>>    contributors, publicity is not the reason for this proposal. We
>> believe
>>>>>    Daffodil could provide a great benefit to the ASF and the numerous
>> data
>>>>>    focused projects that comprise it, as described in the Rationale and
>>>>>    Alignment sections. We hope to build a strong and vibrant community
>>>>>    built around The Apache Way, and not dependent on a single company.
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Documentation ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    Daffodil documentation can be found at:
>>>>>
>>>>>    *
>>>>>    https://opensource.ncsa.illinois.edu/confluence/
>>>>>    display/DFDL/Daffodil%3A+Open+Source+DFDL
>>>>>
>>>>>    Information about DFDL can be found at:
>>>>>
>>>>>    * https://www.ogf.org/ogf/doku.php/standards/dfdl/dfdl
>>>>>    *
>>>>>    https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSMKHH_9.0.
>>>>>    0/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/df20060_.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>    Public examples of DFDL Schemas can be found at:
>>>>>
>>>>>    * https://github.com/DFDLSchemas
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Initial Source ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    The Daffodil git repo goes back to mid-2011 with approximately 20
>>>>>    different contributors and feedback from many users and developers.
>> The
>>>>>    core codebase is written in Scala and includes both a Scala and Java
>>>>>    API, along with Javadocs and Scaladocs for API usage. The initial
>> code
>>>>>    will come from the git repository currently hosted by NCSA at the
>>>>>    University of Illinois :
>>>>>
>>>>>    https://opensource.ncsa.illinois.edu/bitbucket/
>>>>>    projects/DFDL/repos/daffodil/
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Source and Intellectual Property Submission ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    The complete Daffodil code is licensed under the University of
>>>>>    Illinois/NCSA Open Source License. Much of the current codebase has
>> been
>>>>>    developed by Tresys Technology, who is open to relicensing the code
>> to
>>>>>    the Apache License version 2.0 and donate the source to the ASF.
>>>>>    Contacts at NCSA are also open to relicensing their contributions to
>>>>>    Apache v2. We plan to contact the other contributors and ask for
>>>>>    permission to relicense and donate their contributed code. For those
>>>>>    that decline or we cannot contact, their code will be removed or
>>>>>    replaced. We will work closely with Apache Legal to ensure all
>> issues
>>>>>    related to relicensing are acceptable.
>>>>>
>>>>>    == External Dependencies ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    We believe all current dependencies are compatible with the ASF
>>>>>    guidelines. Our dependency licenses come from the following license
>>>>>    styles: Apache v2, BSD, MIT, and ICU. The list of current Daffodil
>>>>>    dependencies and their licenses are documented here:
>>>>>
>>>>>    https://opensource.ncsa.illinois.edu/confluence/
>>>>>    display/DFDL/Dependencies+and+Licenses
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Cryptography ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    None
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Required Resources ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Mailing Lists ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    * comm...@daffodil.incubator.apache.org
>>>>>    * d...@daffodil.incubator.apache.org
>>>>>    * priv...@daffodil.incubator.apache.org
>>>>>    * u...@daffodil.incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Source Control ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    git://git.apache.org/incubator-daffodil.git
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Issue Tracking ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    JIRA Daffodil (DFDL)
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Initial Committers ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    * Beth Finnegan <efinnegan at tresys dot com>
>>>>>    * Dave Thompson <dthompson at tresys dot com>
>>>>>    * Josh Adams <jadams at tresys dot com>
>>>>>    * Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle at tresys dot com>
>>>>>    * Steve Lawrence <slawrence at tresys dot com>
>>>>>    * Taylor Wise <twise at tresys dot com>
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Affiliations ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    * Beth Finnegan (Tresys Technology)
>>>>>    * Dave Thompson (Tresys Technology)
>>>>>    * Josh Adams (Tresys Technology)
>>>>>    * Mike Beckerle (Tresys Technology)
>>>>>    * Steve Lawrence (Tresys Technology)
>>>>>    * Taylor Wise (Tresys Technology)
>>>>>
>>>>>    == Sponsors ==
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Champion ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    * TBD
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Nominated Mentors ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    * TBD
>>>>>
>>>>>    === Sponsoring Entity ===
>>>>>
>>>>>    We request the Apache Incubator to sponsor this project.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>    To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>    For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>    To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> <mailto:general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>>>    For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> <mailto:general-h...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to