On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:16 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think that's correct.
Well, since neither of us is a lawyer (at least I am not) at this point we're debating interpretations on ALv2. > A source distribution with NOTICE may be included in an ASF binary > distribution - e.g. example code is often included in biary dists. > In this case the relevant parts of the source NOTICE would need to be > considered for inclusion in the ASF NOTICE for the binary. > > In other words a source distribution affects all works that include > it, not just source distributiions. My opinion is that you're abusing the notion of the distribution here. > The NOTICE file in an ASF source release must contain all *required* > attributions for all included bits, and must not contain attributions > for bits that are not included. Only INCLUDED bits affect the NOTICE > (and LICENSE) files. Correct. > The process for determining what goes in the ASF NOTICE file starts > with the contents of the associated release artifact. I still maintain that my interpretation of ALv2 makes it relevant what distribution we're talking about source or binary. >> 3. presence or absence of NOTICEs in binary distribution doesn't >> affect source distribution. > > Not true. That would be your opinion at this point. The one that I don't share. >> 4. presence or absence of NOTICEs in source distribution doesn't >> affect binary distribution. > > Not true. Ditto. Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
