Sam Ruby wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > > > The IPMC strongly and clearly expressed the opinion that the Kato > > Mentors needs to be more active or face termination. This is the > > solution I favour personally. > > Incorrect. Some members of the IPMC (including myself) have strongly > and clearly expressed the opinion that the Kato reports do not reflect > the full status. > > I'll state for emphasis: absolutely nobody here has suggested that any > podling be immediately terminated as it has passed some date criteria. > Nobody has named any mentor and suggested that they be terminated. > In fact, I would like to call on everybody to stop using the > drama-filled term "termination" and focus on ensuring that reports > submitted are timely and contain all of the relevant information.
Yes please. We have had this discussion only recently. These states: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html#current http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html#graduated http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html#dormant http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html#retired -David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
