On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: > -1 > > The IPMC is currently discussing how to handle these situations.
The IPMC has descended quickly in a long series of threads heavy on personal abuse and light on constructive proposals. You call this 'discussion'. I call it a waste of time. <snip> > Secondly, and more importantly I'd rather hear from the project > community than a mentor who says (and I paraphrase) "as a mentor I > think everything is OK but lets kill it anyway, I want to make a point > to the IPMC". I appreciate my paraphrase my be doing a disservice to > you Robert, but that is what it reads like to someone with only the > information you provide here. IMO demanding a more active response from Mentors then asking for a recount from the community smells of hypocritical The IPMC strongly and clearly expressed the opinion that the Kato Mentors needs to be more active or face termination. This is the solution I favour personally. Either back the original judgment of Kato's Mentors and trust the community to come up with solutions, remove those holding this minority view from the IPMC, or sign up as a new Mentor for Kato Robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
