On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The IPMC strongly and clearly expressed the opinion that the Kato > Mentors needs to be more active or face termination. This is the > solution I favour personally.
Incorrect. Some members of the IPMC (including myself) have strongly and clearly expressed the opinion that the Kato reports do not reflect the full status. I'll state for emphasis: absolutely nobody here has suggested that any podling be immediately terminated as it has passed some date criteria. Nobody has named any mentor and suggested that they be terminated. In fact, I would like to call on everybody to stop using the drama-filled term "termination" and focus on ensuring that reports submitted are timely and contain all of the relevant information. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
