Does anyone from Bluesky care to comment and/or act on this? IMO the bluesky website needs to be fixed *immediately*, by removing all download links and misleading license-related statements.
-Bertrand On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> While reviewing the BlueSky podling website, I noticed the following issues : >> >> - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing >> to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least >> very confusing, as it can allude users to think this is a endorsed ASF >> release. Is this OK ?.... > > As others have indicated, the download links at > http://incubator.apache.org/bluesky/ point directly to non-ASF servers > hosting, in some cases, GPL-licensed code (XPlayer), without any > mention that said "releases" were made outside of the ASF. > > This is totally unacceptable. > > What would be ok, IMHO, is for the apache.org bluesky pages to point > to a download page on another server, which lists the downloads and > their licenses, and is clearly labelled as non-ASF. > > Bluesky mentors, is this being fixed? > > http://markmail.org/message/l245dde7cjhwzmkj vaguely hints at > "correcting things as quickly as possible", but it's been nine days > since Luciano's message, and the download links are still up at > http://incubator.apache.org/bluesky/ > > -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
