On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While reviewing the BlueSky podling website, I noticed the following issues : > > - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing > to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least > very confusing, as it can allude users to think this is a endorsed ASF > release. Is this OK ?....
As others have indicated, the download links at http://incubator.apache.org/bluesky/ point directly to non-ASF servers hosting, in some cases, GPL-licensed code (XPlayer), without any mention that said "releases" were made outside of the ASF. This is totally unacceptable. What would be ok, IMHO, is for the apache.org bluesky pages to point to a download page on another server, which lists the downloads and their licenses, and is clearly labelled as non-ASF. Bluesky mentors, is this being fixed? http://markmail.org/message/l245dde7cjhwzmkj vaguely hints at "correcting things as quickly as possible", but it's been nine days since Luciano's message, and the download links are still up at http://incubator.apache.org/bluesky/ -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
