On 7/31/08, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: >> >> - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing >>> to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least >>> very confusing, as it can allude users to think this is a endorsed ASF >>> release. Is this OK ? >>> >> >> I don't see a problem with links to pre-ASF releases. BlueSky is not >> unique >> in this respect. There are a number of Apache projects with long pre-ASF >> history. So including links to such releases is totally appropriate. >> However >> a clear indication on the page that those are the releases made outside >> Apache is a good idea. > > > Not only is that not being done, but if you follow the link to, for example, > "Learn more about XPlayer", you will land on an ASF page all about XPlayer > that has a License link that displays the Apache License 2.0, whereas > XPlayer is, as I understand it, GPL licensed. That seems like a pretty > serious no-no to me.
+1 Robert > > -- > Martin Cooper > > > >> >> Andrus >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
