William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I have one small problem, and was otherwise +1 on the final proposed text;
> > This approach is considered inferior by many because it is a source of
> > discord to have a public vote like this fail or take a very long time.
> The reason public votes are inferior is that some of the IPMC members may
> be reluctant to share their private issues or opinions of a prospective
> committer on a public forum, period.
> There is no other reason for not voting in public.
Personally, I generally consider it a bad idea to have discussions of people in
a public forum, a view that I consider reinforced as more employers turn to
scanning the Internet looking for information on staff or potential staff.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
