Noel J. Bergman wrote:
we should remember and capture that Roy raised valid points about having the *vote* be public, albeit after private discussion. It seemed that the idea was to discuss it in private, and only vote in public if it was clear that the vote would go smoothly.
Offhand I don't recall his post, does anyone have a link? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
