On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
As has been noted, the text of Justin's proposal fails to address
that if the vote fails to gain the required binding votes, it is NOT
lazy consensus. The standard rules still apply, and the PMC vote
would be required to supplement the vote, not just a lazy
ratification.
Proposed change to Justin's text would be "After 72 hours and no
requests by any Incubator PMC member for a full vote by the
Incubator PMC, and if the vote is positive (three or more binding +1
votes and no binding -1 votes), the committer request is approved by
the Incubator PMC and the PPMC can start the committer invitation
process."
Umm... why "no binding -1 votes"? I thought adding a committer
wasn't a vetoable thing, just code modifications. This should be a
majority approval vote thing. (with it linked to http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval
for details)
Dan
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
