Leo Simons wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 11:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The bottom line of release management in the ASF.
> All artifacts should be generated from the tagged SVN <
That just isn't the bottom line. It's only the bottom line in some
projects.
The point is that, on the whole, there are many many ways to do really
good and really dilligent release management, including doing very good
tracking of everything in version control, yet still do a lot of things
very differently.
I don't think we disagree all that much, although my point of placing
the LICENSE, COPYRIGHT, NOTICE out front no matter how an individual
chooses to obtain ASF source code still stands :)
Reproduceable as things stood at that time is certainly good enough for
me, and you offer lots of illustrations. Not reproducible (by forgetting
to tag externals, for example) is usually a bad idea.
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
