Kevan
> Your interpretation works if your subversion repository is not a > "distribution". IMO, it is and should contain appropriate license/ > notice/disclaimer. > > --kevan Kevan The SVN tag is only a distribution if it is published as that. The fact that SVN is available to anyone via HTTP does not make it a "distribution" in terms of Apache definitions. Otherwise we could never do any work in SVN unless every single directory has a LICENSE and NOTICE file in it. After all - any directory in SVN is available to the public. The point of a distribution is that it is something that is created by a deliberate act and vote. We haven't been asked to vote on the SVN tag afaik. So I don't agree with your reading. Paul -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
