Leo Simons wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...So it is a new requirement and I don't think we should be making
up policy
during a release vote
+1, that's even part of the policy! It is just *so* annoying that this
keeps happening.
like this as it makes it very frustrating for
poddling. How about letting this UIMA release out as-is for now
while we
work this out?...
Yup. It always gets fuzzy when voting and discussion intermix, but I
do count 3 +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1 votes. That typically
means the vote passes, so UIMA can release.
Right the vote runs for more than 72 hours and we have 3 +1 votes and
one -1 vote.
The other open issue was the checksum representation for MD5 and SHA1.
The representation can be improved and we will do this for the next release.
(I already opened a JIRA issue for that). It is just open what we have
to do for the current release.
-- Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
