-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Jencks wrote: > > I think I'm seeing too much incipient dogmatism here. A little while > ago I remember reading about how it was possible for code to zip > through the incubator on its way to become part of an existing > project, resting only long enough for the legal/provenance questions > to be resolved. I think this is still a good path to keep open, and > don't see the use of a PPMC for it.
Except ActiveMQ isn't just code, it's code+people. If all the people are already associated with the ASF when the podling enters incubation.. well, then why isn't it being handled as a grant of code? The need for a podling implies the presence of people new to the ASF. > For instance, my understanding > is that ActiveMQ is coming to be part of geronimo. Most likely, yes -- but it's not a certainty. (Just close to it.) The eventual disposition is made at graduation. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRBbFR5rNPMCpn3XdAQKqOAQAtm4gWzEgdP9FZKknZWVbszAbIBafgvvn 4wfPatOdUpy577axawHnFDq3i6OG3poPqYn7OecqZkCXSimSIf3Hp7CsijzHnL/x rsluUCyPkW11/zs/lvlkXhpIWjNmpTV0T4EkiadZfIPK704qUE3CHpkKT0uYS7lk xsA1obdLoes= =3klG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
