On 3/8/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we might have a better chance at unifying these disparate > code bases if they are all in one place. And I think that DB might be > just the place. > > For the record, the Apache JDO project has no ORM engine. It has the > testing infrastructure for ORM and it has the JDO specification API, > but no implementation. So having a good JDO implementation is a > project (like your OBJ/EJB3 project) that hasn't begun, and we're > looking for a good base to start from. > > In particular, each of the persistence APIs has a front end (user > API), a back end (the actual object-to-SQL grind), integration (app > servers, web servers, Java SE), and tools. A hundred flowers have > bloomed and I'd like to see more synergy. > > That's why I like the idea of Cayenne in DB and would also like to > see OpenJPA in DB as well.
Exactly my thoughts :-) Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
