On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 22:24, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le jeudi 1 avril 2021, 12:21:20 CEST sebb a écrit : > > Are we all agreed that: > > - projects which are moved to the Attic should not have their > > repositories renamed > > - repositories should instead be made read-only and marked as such (as per > > [4]) > > yes, agree > > > > > If so, I will raise an INFRA JIRA to get the existing repo renames reverted. > making explicit GitBox vs GitHub can be useful
Not sure what you mean by that. > and sharing the idea: what if GitHub "archive" feature could have a GitBox > counterpart? There is already an archive feature. Several of the Airflow repos are marked as archived: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#airflow Ideally the entire project block would be marked in some way, possibly as well as marking all the repos. > Regards, > > Hervé > >
