Le jeudi 1 avril 2021, 20:45:27 CEST Mads Toftum a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:21:20AM +0100, sebb wrote: > > Are we all agreed that: > > - projects which are moved to the Attic should not have their > > repositories renamed > > - repositories should instead be made read-only and marked as such (as per > > [4]) > Agreed? no. > The more I think about it, the more I become convinced that projects > under attic should be named accordingly. What other projects don't name > their projects with the project name? If we were creating these projects to maintain them alive, I would agree: yes, when we'll move our Atttic site from svn to Git, its Git repository will be attic-site.git, such will it be of anything we'll create to maintain the Attic
But our usual job is not about creating projects: we're given oversight on pre-existing projects when they are retired, to put them in amber for eternity. If we can avoid to alter anything while putting retired projects in amber, it's better, to let pre-existing community still find the retired project at the same place it was in the past. Regards, Hervé > > vh > > Mads Toftum
