On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:02:58AM +0100, sebb wrote: > Infra say that the rename of the Git repos was to allow write access > by Attic people. > I assume that the attic- prefix turns it into an Attic-controlled repo. > > This would allow Attic access and deny project access. > > Project access can also be denied by dropping the LDAP group (which > happens anyway). > > Even if we did still need temporary write access, there are better > ways to manage it than renaming the repo. > For example, by joining the LDAP group before it is deleted. > > I did not need write access for any of the recent projects that I dealt with. > Yeah, I suppose the main argument in favor of moving it would be to make it clear that you're looking at an attic codebase. I see the inconvenience of broken links, but on balance maybe it's better to have a clear signal that this is an unmaintained repo?
vh Mads Toftum -- http://flickr.com/photos/q42/
