Hi r, I use BASH as a quick prototype for simple program. For more complex script, I would write them in Ruby. BASH used to have less issues until DASH got into Ubuntu. And since then I have always try to use BASH Sha-Bang to avoid problems. Thanks r.
Best Regards, Paul Tan -----Original Message----- From: r <[email protected]> To: gEDA developer mailing list <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 2:35 pm Subject: Re: gEDA-dev: gEDA already support BUS and Hierarchy On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Paul Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi r, > > There are "=~" with quoted regex in many places in that > script, and I had been using that all these times, never > had any problem. Perhaps I haven't hit those paths or they didn't trigger any clearly visible errors. > Did you have similar problems in that script with quoted > RHS using "=~" ? Were you able to do all the steps and > pass the Verilog sim? I didn't try to run verilog sims yet. I've gone through all the steps from README.txt to verilog netlisting - they all looked fine. Actually I've been looking into your script as an example of how to use gschem with hierarchical designs rather than a final tool. As for the incompatibilities, that's an inevitable effect of writing non-trivial (I mean, doing more than executing a bunch of well-defined commands) scripts in bash. It's generally safer and easier to write the same thing in Perl. Regards, -r _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
