1.3.39 produces code that does not compile on x64 Windows (at least with MSVC). See: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2928. The ticket mentions c# bindings but the same is true for the Java bindings. Rolling back to 1.3.38 fixes the problem.
-- Ben > -----Original Message----- > From: gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:gdal-dev- > boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Even Rouault > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 1:22 PM > To: Frank Warmerdam > Cc: gdal-dev > Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] SWIG Version > > I've been using SWIG 1.3.39 for Java bindings for a few months now, and > it's working fine. > > Frank Warmerdam a écrit : > > Folks - particularly swig bindings maintainers, > > > > I have regenerated the swig bindings for python with swig 1.3.39 on > > www.gdal.org and committed them. I used that version to be > compatible > > with what Even used last time. However, the scripts that building > > the perl and csharp bindings for the nightly snapshots are still > using > > SWIG 1.3.36. > > > > Before GDAL 1.7 release, I'd like us to settle on a preferred version > of > > SWIG and I will update this to be the one used for the nightly > snapshots > > and that we would use at other times for building source > distributions. > > > > Is SWIG 1.3.39 acceptable for all bindings maintainers? > > > > PS. SWIG 1.3.39 is built and installed in ~warmerdam/gdal-swig on > > www.gdal.org (aka xblade14). SWIG 1.3.36 is in /usr/local/bin. > > > > Best regards, > > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
