I've been using SWIG 1.3.39 for Java bindings for a few months now, and it's working fine.

Frank Warmerdam a écrit :
Folks - particularly swig bindings maintainers,

I have regenerated the swig bindings for python with swig 1.3.39 on
www.gdal.org and committed them.  I used that version to be compatible
with what Even used last time.  However, the scripts that building
the perl and csharp bindings for the nightly snapshots are still using
SWIG 1.3.36.

Before GDAL 1.7 release, I'd like us to settle on a preferred version of
SWIG and I will update this to be the one used for the nightly snapshots
and that we would use at other times for building source distributions.

Is SWIG 1.3.39 acceptable for all bindings maintainers?

PS. SWIG 1.3.39 is built and installed in ~warmerdam/gdal-swig on
www.gdal.org (aka xblade14).   SWIG 1.3.36 is in /usr/local/bin.

Best regards,


_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to