On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:43 AM Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha wrote: > > > Linker adds glibc versions in GNU_PROPERTY_1_GLIBC_2_NEEDED to the > > .gnu.version_r section and removes GNU_PROPERTY_1_GLIBC_2_NEEDED note > > when generating shared libraries and executables. > > Note that there is no guarantee that a new glibc version actually has any > symbols in libc at the corresponding symbol version (there are no > GLIBC_2.20 symbols in any ABI test baseline for any architecture, for > example). If it happens not to, will the symbol version exist at all to > satisfy this check? >
Then we need to add a new glibc version if it happens. -- H.J.
