On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha wrote: > Linker adds glibc versions in GNU_PROPERTY_1_GLIBC_2_NEEDED to the > .gnu.version_r section and removes GNU_PROPERTY_1_GLIBC_2_NEEDED note > when generating shared libraries and executables.
Note that there is no guarantee that a new glibc version actually has any symbols in libc at the corresponding symbol version (there are no GLIBC_2.20 symbols in any ABI test baseline for any architecture, for example). If it happens not to, will the symbol version exist at all to satisfy this check? -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
