On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 6:43 AM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: > > * H. J. Lu: > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 11:52 PM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> * H. J. Lu via llvm-dev: > >> > >> > 1. Some binaries which require new ELF features, like DT_RELR, only > >> > work with the new glibc binary. They crash at run-time with the older > >> > glibc binaries. > >> > 2. Somes binaries compiled with the new language features, like C2X > >> > printf specifiers, only generate correct results with the new glibc > >> > binary. Since we don't add new glibc versions to the printf function > >> > family, they generate incorrect results at run-time with the older > >> > glibc binaries. > >> > >> Solaris uses SHT_SUNW_verneed sections for this, not a property note. > >> Property notes seem the wrong approach for this. And there is no reason > >> to make this specific to glibc. > >> > >> However, I still very much dislike this proposal. > >> > > > > Can you share your concerns? > > See the other thread (mostly on libc-alpha I think). >
OK. Let's resolve it in the glibc community first. Thanks. -- H.J.
