Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> writes: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:34, Daniel Jacobowitz <d...@false.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 04:29:29PM +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: >>> I suppose LTO plugins means plugin dlopen-ed in lto-plugin/lto-symtab.c >> >> It sounds to me like this confusion comes from "LTO plugins". Isn't >> it just "LTO plugin"? That is, a specific plugin? > > Yes, in the strictest sense it should be named 'gold plugin for LTO'.
Well, the plugin design was intended to be supportable in other linkers, and I, at least, hope that other linkers will in fact adopt the interface. So it should be 'linker plugin for LTO'. (And as such it is really is part of gcc, not the binutils.) Ian
