Diego Novillo wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:10, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
<bas...@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
Then I would imagine it requires a copyright transfer to FSF different of
the one covering GCC development. The legal document covering my
contribution cites specifically GCC (not binutils).
Getting that copyright transfer signed by my employer was so painful that I
would never go thru that again :-( :-(
But then, I would imagine that LTO plugins only discussion should go to a
binutils or a gold list [which I don't subscribe to], not a gcc one!
What are you talking about?
on a recent gcc trunk rev 152527
grep -rn dlopen | fgrep .c:
gives
gcc/plugin.c:418: dl_handle = dlopen (plugin->full_name, RTLD_NOW
RTLD_GLOBAL);
lto-plugin/lto-symtab.c:140: plugin_handle = dlopen (name, RTLD_LAZY);
and other occurrences java or mudflap related
I suppose LTO plugins means plugin dlopen-ed in lto-plugin/lto-symtab.c
Are these inside the cc1 process? is GGC (that is gengtype GTY-ed
garbage collection) usable from them?
[my blind guess is no to both questions!]
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
