Diego Novillo wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 09:55, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
<bas...@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
Are LTO plugins fondamentally different from others, non LTO plugins?
Yes, it should be probably be named 'linker' plugins. It's a plugin
for gold to allow extraction of individual .o files out of static
archives during LTO compiles.
Then I would imagine it requires a copyright transfer to FSF different
of the one covering GCC development. The legal document covering my
contribution cites specifically GCC (not binutils).
Getting that copyright transfer signed by my employer was so painful
that I would never go thru that again :-( :-(
But then, I would imagine that LTO plugins only discussion should go to
a binutils or a gold list [which I don't subscribe to], not a gcc one!
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
