On 15/02/2008, Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 22:17 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > The m68k/coldfire is suffering from this regression the > > > RTEMS community really would like to see resolved. > > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35088 > > > > Please try this patch; I've had it around for a while for what looks like > > a similar problem on m68k-uclinux but haven't got round to doing the > > necessary regression testing (and didn't know the bug in question was a > > regression, or have a reduced testcase). (Is it a regression? That bug > > isn't marked as such, and only regression fixes are going on trunk at > > present.) > > Well, what to consider to be a regression is a matter of POV. :)
Don't think so. A regression is something that used to work and not it doesn't. You only have to give the version where it worked and the version where it started failing. That bug is not marked as a regression probably because no relevant maintainer has looked at it. Whether the relevant maintainers missed it or they don't have time to deal with it, that I ignore. Cheers, Manuel.
