On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote: > > Also regarding ARM, PR31849 > > (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31849 > > <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31849>) is a show stopper, > > at least for some embedded bare metal targets, i.e. arm-elf and > > arm-none-eabi. > > > > Until size optimization at least matches gcc 4.2, gcc 4.3 will have very > > limited audience there. I'm not aware of gcc internals in order to help > > with a fix, but I'm available to help testing, should anyone requires that. > > > > > The m68k/coldfire is suffering from this regression the > RTEMS community really would like to see resolved. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35088 > > I just emailed everyone who touched the m68k port since > last summer a charity appeal. :-D
No m86k triple is primary or secondary target, so this is not going to block the release. But there was plenty of time for the rtems/m68k people to look at problems with their port. Richard.
