Hi, On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Paul Brook wrote:
> > There seem to be solid reasons to permit this, and no very strong ones > > to prohibit it. We can consider it to be a GNU extension for vectors. > > Vectors are of course themselves an extension already. > > How are you suggesting it be implemented? > > Will the front/middle-end convert it to (vNsf)((vNsi)a | (vNsi)b), or do all > vector backends need to lie about having float vector bitwise operations? optabs and open-coding on expand when unavailable? Like other constructs? Ciao, Michael.
