On 8/22/07, tbp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you're running too far with your sarcasm. SSE's instructions do
> > not go so far as to specify integer vs. floating point.  To me, "ps"
> > means "32-bit SIMD", independent of integerness.
> Excuse me if i'm amazed being replied  bitwise ops on floating values
> make no sense as the justification for breaking something that used to
> work and match hardware features. I naively thought that was the
> purpose of that convenient extension.

Which hardware (remember GCC is a generic compiler)?  VMX/Altivec and
SPU actually does not have different instructions for bitwise
and/ior/xor for different vector types (it is all the same
instruction).  I have ran into ICEs with even bitwise on vector
float/double on x86 also in the past which is the other reason why I
disabled them.  Since this is an extension, it would be nice if it was
nicely defined extension which means disabling them for vector
float/double.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Reply via email to