Re-revisiting it... > Revisiting an old thread... > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:40:20PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > So... why is it illegal to put a constant into a single bit field? > > > > Probably because it was more efficient to use some other pattern > > for some other target. > > That's a bad reason to put it in the MI code, since the target could > simply reject those requests itself. Does anyone remember which > target needed this? If not, can we remove that test?
Nobody has said anything about this for the last two weeks. Can we remove this restriction now?
