This seems to have gotten forgotten: > Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:12:20 -0500 > From: DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, ian@airs.com
> It seems like the very next thing it does is generate and emit the > reload insns via emit_reload_insns(). > > However, I modified my logic to check to see if the other thing we're > merging with is also an address; if it's not, we stick with > RELOAD_OTHER. I fiddled with the logic to look for reloads for the > new RELOAD_FOR_OTHER_ADDRESS too, but I suspect if we find any, > something may go wrong anyway. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00377.html
