gcc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Matt Rice via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Jeffrey Walton via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain enh via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Iain Sandoe
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • RE: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Jiang, Haochen via Gcc
  • RE: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • RE: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Jiang, Haochen via Gcc
  • RE: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • RE: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain Jiang, Haochen via Gcc
• I need a Linux C Project. Marco Marques via Gcc
• Linking to windows library slipbits
  • Re: Linking to windows library LIU Hao via Gcc
• x86_64 regression tests arbitrary failing? Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: x86_64 regression tests arbitrary failing? Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: x86_64 regression tests arbitrary failing? Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: x86_64 regression tests arbitrary failing? Georg-Johann Lay
• Ordering function layout for locality follow-up Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
• Signing your git commits Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Signing your git commits Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Signing your git commits Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Signing your git commits Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Signing your git commits Paul Koning via Gcc
• Gcc Matilda via Gcc
• b4 config Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Editorconfig Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Resurrect PowrPC SPE port feasible? Sebastian Huber
  • Re: Resurrect PowrPC SPE port feasible? David Edelsohn via Gcc
  • Re: Resurrect PowrPC SPE port feasible? Sebastian Huber
  • Re: Resurrect PowrPC SPE port feasible? David Edelsohn via Gcc
  • Re: Resurrect PowrPC SPE port feasible? Sebastian Huber
  • Re: Resurrect PowrPC SPE port feasible? David Edelsohn via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240915 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
  • Re: gcc-15-20240915 is now available Alain Mosnier
  • Re: gcc-15-20240915 is now available Alain Mosnier
  • Re: gcc-15-20240915 is now available Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: gcc-15-20240915 is now available Alain Mosnier
• DEI statement and why we should have one Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240914 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Update bootstrap requirement to C++14? Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: Update bootstrap requirement to C++14? Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Update bootstrap requirement to C++14? Joel Sherrill via Gcc
  • Re: Update bootstrap requirement to C++14? Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: Update bootstrap requirement to C++14? Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Update bootstrap requirement to C++14? Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: Update bootstrap requirement to C++14? Matthieu Longo via Gcc
• LTO progress indicator Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
  • Re: LTO progress indicator Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
  • Re: LTO progress indicator Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: LTO progress indicator Jan Hubicka via Gcc
  • Re: LTO progress indicator Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
  • Re: LTO progress indicator David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: LTO progress indicator Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
  • Re: LTO progress indicator Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
  • Re: LTO progress indicator Andi Kleen via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240913 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Inquiry Regarding -Wrange-loop-construct Warning Behavior in GCC 14 Sunil Kumar Dora
  • Re: Inquiry Regarding -Wrange-loop-construct Warning Behavior in GCC 14 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Inquiry Regarding -Wrange-loop-construct Warning Behavior in GCC 14 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Hi from Kenneth.. Kenneth Churcher via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240912 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Sourceware Open Office Friday and Cauldron Monday Mark Wielaard
• [CAULDRON] Topics for the Toolchain and Linux kernel BoF Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: [CAULDRON] Topics for the Toolchain and Linux kernel BoF Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: [CAULDRON] Topics for the Toolchain and Linux kernel BoF Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: [CAULDRON] Topics for the Toolchain and Linux kernel BoF Sam James via Gcc
• Question about creating clones of ipcp clones Prachi Godbole via Gcc
  • Re: Question about creating clones of ipcp clones Martin Jambor
• Revolutionize Your Software Sales with EngageBay 💻 Andy Roberts via Gcc
• Late combine & mode switch Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
  • Re: Late combine & mode switch Richard Sandiford via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240908 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240907 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240906 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Proposed new pass to optimise mode register assignments Andrew Carlotti via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed new pass to optimise mode register assignments Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed new pass to optimise mode register assignments Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed new pass to optimise mode register assignments Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed new pass to optimise mode register assignments Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed new pass to optimise mode register assignments Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed new pass to optimise mode register assignments Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed new pass to optimise mode register assignments Andrew Carlotti via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed new pass to optimise mode register assignments Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed new pass to optimise mode register assignments Jeff Law via Gcc
• #pragma once behavior Jeremy Rifkin
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Jeremy Rifkin
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Jeremy Rifkin
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Jeremy Rifkin
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Jeremy Rifkin
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Michael Clark via Gcc
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Jeremy Rifkin
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: #pragma once behavior Jeremy Rifkin
• gcc-12-20240905 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• PIC-text, ABS-data code generation Nathan Sidwell via Gcc
• Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Andreas K. Huettel via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Oskari Pirhonen via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Wookey
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Khem Raj via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Andreas K. Huettel via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Paul Eggert
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Todd Vierling via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Andreas K. Huettel via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Andreas K. Huettel via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Paul Eggert
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Andreas K. Huettel via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Bruno Haible
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Bruno Haible
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Jacob Bachmeyer via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Andreas K. Huettel via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Todd Vierling via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Khem Raj via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Andreas K. Huettel via Gcc
  • Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition Michał Górny via Gcc
• On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Iain Sandoe
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Iain Sandoe
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Nathaniel Shead via Gcc
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Iain Sandoe
  • Re: On the subject of module consumer diagnostics. Nathaniel Shead via Gcc
• [no subject] Antonio Medrano via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240901 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240831 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Bugs in GCC 14.2 …/fixed-include/ files Andy Miller via Gcc
  • Re: Bugs in GCC 14.2 …/fixed-include/ files Iain Sandoe
  • Re: Bugs in GCC 14.2 …/fixed-include/ files Andy Miller via Gcc
  • Re: Bugs in GCC 14.2 …/fixed-include/ files Iain Sandoe
• gcc-13-20240830 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Awiting bloor Shamima Semi via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240829 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• History/Pupose of Double Newline in gcc --version ryderkeys via Gcc
• Non-consistent ICE in 14.1 and 14.2 Allan Sandfeld Jensen
  • Re: Non-consistent ICE in 14.1 and 14.2 Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Non-consistent ICE in 14.1 and 14.2 Alexander Monakov
  • Re: Non-consistent ICE in 14.1 and 14.2 Allan Sandfeld Jensen
• Fixing dormant bugs in obstack code David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Fixing dormant bugs in obstack code Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Fixing dormant bugs in obstack code Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: Fixing dormant bugs in obstack code Florian Weimer via Gcc
• files in (at least) two archives in https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/ contain case-sensitive file names Rob Groen via Gcc
• Ccccccxcbbcb Anthony Colombo via Gcc
• -Wstringop-truncation false positive thoughts Belliveau, Fran - 0666 - MITLL via Gcc
• Msr Jazmine Jones via Gcc
• Help with a RTL manipulation Julian Waters via Gcc
• Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain on 2024-08-29 at 11am EST5EDT. Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240825 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240824 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• value-range.cc:2165: ICE in invert Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: value-range.cc:2165: ICE in invert Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: value-range.cc:2165: ICE in invert Andrew MacLeod via Gcc
  • Re: value-range.cc:2165: ICE in invert Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: value-range.cc:2165: ICE in invert Georg-Johann Lay
• DDD-3.4.1 Debugger GUI released Michael Eager
• gcc-13-20240823 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [pushed] fortran: Minor fix to -ffrontend-optimize description (was: typo on homepage) Gerald Pfeifer
• Drafting, Rendering & Estimating michael--- via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240822 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Re: gcc-wwwdocs branch python-formatting created. e1e17c97a8ae35cfb6b2f7428fb52b05f82450d1 Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: gcc-wwwdocs branch python-formatting created. e1e17c97a8ae35cfb6b2f7428fb52b05f82450d1 Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: gcc-wwwdocs branch python-formatting created. e1e17c97a8ae35cfb6b2f7428fb52b05f82450d1 Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: gcc-wwwdocs branch python-formatting created. e1e17c97a8ae35cfb6b2f7428fb52b05f82450d1 Alexander Monakov
  • Re: gcc-wwwdocs branch python-formatting created. e1e17c97a8ae35cfb6b2f7428fb52b05f82450d1 Mark Wielaard
  • Re: gcc-wwwdocs branch python-formatting created. e1e17c97a8ae35cfb6b2f7428fb52b05f82450d1 Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: gcc-wwwdocs branch python-formatting created. e1e17c97a8ae35cfb6b2f7428fb52b05f82450d1 Mark Wielaard
• [RFC] Return Value Propagation in IPA-CP Dhruv Chawla via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Return Value Propagation in IPA-CP Dhruv Chawla via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Return Value Propagation in IPA-CP Jan Hubicka via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Return Value Propagation in IPA-CP Dhruv Chawla via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Return Value Propagation in IPA-CP Dhruv Chawla via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Return Value Propagation in IPA-CP Dhruv Chawla via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Return Value Propagation in IPA-CP Martin Jambor

• Earlier messages
• Later messages