On 24 November 2013 02:57, Kenneth Zadeck <zad...@naturalbridge.com> wrote: > if the compiler produced an error message about not finding something, we > added the include.
If you can't tell what you need/should include by what you use, that leads to fragile design. > It is possible that some of these may be redundant as > things have moved around, but safety is not an issue. I mean safe as in robust design. If the only way to tell if you need the include is if you get an error message otherwise, things might break when other includes are removed / moved around in the including file, or if an implementation in the included files changes.
