On 23 November 2013 19:19, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: > Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port > and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through > the entire patch. This patch covers the arc port. > > Ok? > wide-int.h says widest_int is always signed, yet the iterations count in the doloop interface is now unsigned. So, which is right, the code or the documentation?
I see that dfp.c and vax.c directly include wide-int.h, but aarch64.c and arc.c don't. Is that safe? Is there a rationale which files directly include wide-int.h and which ones don't?
