On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 08/10/2013 06:04 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> >> Also, in the new comment, you refer to a "stack", but in the same patch >> you removed a std::stack and added a std::vector as data member, something >> seems inconsistent. > > I had having a closer look to this: if one looks at the code now, without > knowing that a std::stack was there probably the comment makes perfect > sense, doesn't appear confusing (after all you are just using push_back and > pop_back, and std::vector is fine for that).
I have to use a vector, because I need to iterate it while manipulating it as a stack. -- Tim Shen
backref.patch
Description: Binary data
