Hi
Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> ha scritto: >Since newdecl points to the same tree node as decl1, I don't see what >difference this would make. Yeah ;) I think it would if instead of tree newdecl = decl1 I had copy_node (decl1), right? But I understand it's normally not needed... And I'm not too worried about making >changes to a decl that's erroneous anyway. I see. > >Your earlier patch, plus removing the FIXME, is OK. Will do, thanks! Paolo
